Press "Enter" to skip to content

No Problem At All With Supervisors “Recess”

It's impossible not to recognize the seemingly institutional dysfunction in the governing process of this county. Too many elected officials and “public servants” who are classified as department heads, middle management, and “staff,” go out of their way to create problems when their main goal and purpose is to provide services to the public and solve problems when they arise. Most people don't have lofty expectations of their elected representatives. Most would settle for an adaptation of the Physician's Oath, “First, do no harm.”

The Supervisors don’t understand their role as elected officials. Elected officials are supposed to carry out the wishes/demands of clear majorities of constituents unless what they’re asking is unlawful or totally unfeasible, neither of which are applicable with 99.9% of the issues they deal with. It’s not the Supervisor’s job to substitute their judgment for that of their constituents when those constituents overwhelmingly demand a different course of action than that contemplated by the Supervisors.

As I like to say, there really is a reason why The Great Spirit Above created us with two ears but just one mouth.

Recently, the CEO’s office sent out the following press release:

“Board of Supervisors Recess—The Mendocino County Board of Supervisors will observe its annual August Recess from August 1, 2024, to August 30, 2024. During this period, the Board will not hold Regular Board Meetings. This annual recess, implemented in 2022, allows Clerk of the Board staff to focus on essential behind-the-scenes tasks, including records filing, completion of annually required duties, and preparation for the upcoming year. While there are no Regular Board Meetings in August, the Members of the Board of Supervisors continue to hold/attend their other regularly scheduled committee and public meetings during the August Recess.”

Altogether, including the August “recess,” the supervisors will not meet in formal meetings for seven weeks. However, as the press release says, they will “hold/attend their other regularly scheduled committee and public meetings during the August Recess.”

A lot of folks are upset that the County is calling timeout for this “recess.”

First of all, let me assure you there is no justification for the adjournment of government business to allow the “Clerk of the Board staff to focus on essential behind-the-scenes tasks, including records filing, completion of annually required duties, and preparation for the upcoming year.”

Prior to the year of 2022 when this policy was first implemented by former County Executive Officer Carmel Angelo, the idea of a “recess” was unheard of. If the Clerk of the Board, who doubles as the CEO, can’t manage her staff so that they are completing “essential behind-the-scenes tasks, including records filing, completion of annually required duties, and preparation for the upcoming year,” the Supervisors need to find a new CEO, and perhaps a new staff, who can do their jobs and get their work done on time.

This is not a huge ask as in the past 50 years, previous Clerks of the Board and their staff never required a “recess” to do the their jobs.

Of course, during earlier decades, the Clerk of the Board was an independent position, organizationally under and reporting to the Board of Supervisors, not the CEO. As is the case with numerous governing process elements, procedures and policies were changed by the CEO, basically unchallenged by the BOS.

Now having said all of this, I’m going to tell you something.

As I’ve said many times before, it never concerns me when our elected representatives take time off, no matter what the reason is. A congressman is gone on a two-week paid junket to the South of France, good for him, I hope he has fantastic culinary experiences and plenty of five-martini lunches.

Here’s the deal.

Politics and the governing process are now so dysfunctional and unproductive, we are actually so much better off when politicians, including our Board of Supervisors, are absent from their august chambers because they are unable to make much mischief when they aren’t on the clock.

You might say the more junket-sprees politicians reward themselves with, the better off we are.


So once again, the county is at a crossroads with numerous issues that must be addressed.

Back in 2021, the CEO and the Supes implemented a so-called “Five-Year Strategic Planning Process” that was touted as to “help guide the work of county government through 2027.”

Do you have any idea of just where that much-ballyhooed $130k strategic plan is now in the latter stages of 2024?

I know I don’t have a clue and neither do the Supervisors.

Instead of talking about amorphous, indecipherable strategic plans, how about focusing on something called priorities or a fix-it list?

Here’s a short inventory of what needs to be accomplished and/or overhauled and fixed.

  • Overhauling five decades of failed homeless policies and programs.
  • Overhauling five decades of failed mental health policies and programs.
  • Fixing the ever-deteriorating road and bridge infrastructure.
  • Simplifying a marijuana ordinance that is rotting like a beached whale.
  • Fixing 30 years of a housing shortage brought on by short-sighted and nearly non-existent affordable housing planning.

There are many other items that could — and should — appear on this list, but let’s keep it to a manageable workload of just five priority items for the Supes to address, and hopefully make demonstrable and verifiable progress on.

Of course, permeating the entire local governing process is that both previous and current Boards of Supervisors have functioned basically as a rubber-stamp for virtually every proposal emanating from the County Executive Officer and staff.

That dynamic must change, and the Supervisors must reassert their control over the CEO and staff who are un-elected bureaucrats whose primary role is to support elected supervisors in their duties to articulate and represent the best interests of their constituents.

That reversal of roles is without a doubt the number one item on the Supervisors’ list of priorities.

(Jim Shields is the Mendocino County Observer’s editor and publisher, observer@pacific.net, the long-time district manager of the Laytonville County Water District, and is also chairman of the Laytonville Area Municipal Advisory Council. Listen to his radio program “This and That” every Saturday at 12 noon on KPFN 105.1 FM, also streamed live: http://www.kpfn.org)

4 Comments

  1. Mark Donegan August 31, 2024

    I have learned a lot from your writings, appreciate it very much. From what I have seen you are very accurate. I have learned it takes very little to be a supervisor. I have also learned it takes more than most are giving to be a proper supervisor. The biggest thing I have learned is very little is up to them if the public would speak. I do many different little things for people others will not, and by doing so what I have seen, it is those that complain, usually the general public, that’s does not follow through on their parts as good citizens. The other thing I am learning is if it is perceived as an attack, in this county, you will be attacked back. We need to work on chilling our responses. I myself have much to work upon. Know I am trying and am sorry when I fall short.
    Sincerely,
    Mark Donegan

    • Call It As I See It August 31, 2024

      You get attacked because you are Mo’s Troll. Not because you’re doing good as a board member that Mo made happen. You are her voice and tell people some of the things she has put you up too. If Mo needs some dirty work done, Mark Donegan is her lackey.

  2. Lee Edmundson August 31, 2024

    Jim Shields’ analysis and commentary is spot-on.
    I would suggest one caveat; the Board of Supervisors and County Government isn’t simply dysfunctional. It is malfunctional. The CEO’s office has got to be dissolved. The office of Chief Administrative Officer has to be resurrected. The office of The Clerk of the Board has to be restored to the auspices of the Board of Supervisors, along with the Clerk’s staff.

    That’s the beginning of a new day for Mendocino County government. Nothing less. And very soon. If the Supervisors dare to take it.

  3. Eric Sunswheat August 31, 2024

    —> August 26, 2024
    In 2020, researchers compared children in year-round schools—which took shorter breaks between terms to avoid the long summer break—with those who attended schools that followed traditional calendars. The children on long summer breaks were more sedentary, spent more time on screens, and had lower sleep quality…
    Anecdotally, every teacher in my life tells me they find the structure of the school year challenging: kids need rest and play, they acknowledged, but learning loss is evident.
    One pointed out that shorter breaks would be ideal, but schools are too hot in the summertime—though not all children have a cooler refuge at home. “I’d love a three months on, one month off situation,” one wrote; another suggested a four-day school week, which some districts in British Columbia have trialled over the past decades. But alternatives to the norm are rare…
    In Japan, schools typically have three short breaks between terms and one-third more days of instruction. Children are also less intensively supervised: in Tokyo neighbourhoods, a song is broadcast at 5 p.m. as a daily test of the emergency sound system, but it’s also a city-wide reminder for kids to head home as their parents finish work.
    Many European countries have similarly-scheduled school years but much more vacation for working adults. Distributing vacation time more evenly across the school year might benefit students, but it won’t address the widespread problem of North American parents who are expected to work fifty weeks per year.
    https://thewalrus.ca/is-summer-break-bad-for-everyone/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

-