You are eligible to receive Supplemental Security Income, SSI payments (about $914 a month), if you are blind or disabled or over sixty-five, and have $2000 or less in the bank. (In this essay I’m focusing on those over sixty-five.) You can own your home and that will not be counted as an asset, no matter the value. You can own one car, of any value, and that is also not counted against you.
You don’t have to be blind or disabled, only sixty-five, and not eligible for Social Security (SSA) because you didn’t pay enough into the system while working, or you never worked. (If you’re already getting roughly less than $1000 from SSA you can apply for SSI also to increase your income. For example, if you’re only getting $400 from SSA you would probably get approximately $500 more from SSI.)
I’m surprised that so many people around here don’t know these basic facts about the government assistance for which they are eligible. (Even a long-time social worker I talked to yesterday didn’t know you only had to be sixty-five to get on SSI.)
Late last year I heard of a friend of a friend who’s a broke senior of seventy-seven who applied for SSA, found that he wasn’t eligible, no one at Social Security told him about the SSI option, and he had never heard of it. He’s stranded on his mountain waiting for his car to be repaired and he sold another vehicle recently to generate funds to live on for awhile. Now he has the number and is going to call and apply. (Success story: a month later he’s applied, was approved, and is getting paid.)
To apply for SSI you call 866.828.1991 in Eureka or the national number 800.772.1213, and expect to wait on the line, sometimes up to an hour, to talk to a representative. When you call they will start your application right then or you can make a phone appointment for later, or an appointment to come to the local Social Security office, or just drop into one of the local offices to start your application. (Eureka: 3144 Broadway, 95501/ Ukiah: 521 S Orchard Ave, 95482.) You can also start your application online at ssa.com but the phone call is better I was told by someone working in the system.
Be prepared to give them access to your bank account, they may go back as far as six years of your bank statements to see if you are eligible, then once you get on SSI they may check your account at any time to make sure you don’t have more than $2000 in your account. (They’re pretty intrusive during the application process but once you’re on they usually leave you alone.)
Sometimes you’re approved within twenty minutes if your situation is very clear, and your bank account checks out. If you have had more money and now it’s gone you may be asked to produce receipts for what you spent it on. (If you’re actively spending down the amount in your bank account to be eligible, which they actually recommend, it could be helpful to keep your receipts.)
When you’re spending down your bank account, if you buy things of value, like an expensive painting, that counts against you and you might not be quickly approved. If you buy, for example, a washing machine, car, refrigerator, or pay for repairs on any of those appliances or on your car or home, that spending won’t count against you in your application.
You’re allowed to own only one piece of property to qualify for SSI. If you have two and sell one below market value or sign it over to a friend or family member then you have to wait two years to be eligible. (If you sell a second piece of land at market value then you will have too much money to qualify, until you spend it down.)
You can’t have rental income or any stocks and bonds, you have to be really poor. If you’re living in a family or friend’s house rent-free that is counted as an asset. For example, if the value of the total house rental is estimated to be $1000, then approximately a third, $300, may be subtracted from your monthly payment.
(Once you’re on, you’re on for the rest of your life, so congratulations in advance! However they are very suspicious about fraud so they may make it harder for you if you seem evasive or, like in a recent case I heard about, don’t want to give them full access to your bank account, which is a red flag for them.)
You can receive Social Security (SSA), the system you paid into while working, while vacationing or living outside the country, but with Supplemental Security Income (SSI) you can only be out of the country for a month, then back for at least a month, before leaving again.
I encourage anyone eligible to apply for SSI, or if you know of any family or friends who are struggling, convince them to apply and help them navigate the process. I’m inclined to think that there’s a lot of old hippies living out in the hills around here who have lost their livelihoods and never paid much, or anything, into Social Security. That’s why we have SSI, to help those near the bottom economic rung of society from falling through the cracks and becoming destitute and/or homeless.
If you are under sixty-five and trying to get on SSI by being physically or mentally disabled and unable to work, you might be eligible but it will be harder and take longer to get approved, factoring in health records and examinations by doctors and psychiatrists. (I’m focusing here on what I consider the slam-dunk cases, the sixty-five or over demographic, but am also thinking a legally blind person of any age can probably qualify pretty easily.)
There should be more outreach into the community to find those eligible and encourage and help them sign up. Maybe a grant-writer could get funds for the salary of a local SSI outreach worker, to find and help these who need help, and might not even be aware they are eligible for SSI.
If a hundred people were helped to apply for and receive SSI in the following year, about two a week, not only would they be personally helped but that could create a cash infusion of over a million dollars a year into our struggling local economy, for the next decade or so.
There are more details, rules, etc, but this is a start.
Any questions? Call Social Security at 800.772.1213 for all the answers.
* * *
Update: Recently I called up the Social Security help-line to ask some questions for this guy I know, “Jackie Daniels,” who’s between stable housing and wasn’t sure what to say his residence was. I found the representative very informed, knew all the rules, and was helpful answering all my questions.
Here is, paraphrased, what he said:
If your living situation is unstable and you’re staying in something like a shed in your friend’s backyard, or couch-surfing rent-free, then give Social Security the physical address of the location, and get a letter from the property owner saying you are living there.
If it’s just temporary, or you don’t know the physical address, or the owner doesn’t want to give you a letter, or you don’t want to ask him, then you are officially homeless, and you don’t have to produce the info about the address where you’re staying.
Tell Social Security which one of these apply to you while on your phone application call. (According to their website you don’t need a residence or address to get SSI, they say they will find you to pay you.)
This just in: Jackie Daniels got paid!
Someone suggested approaching Social Security and seeing if they want to increase their outreach to the Humboldt/Mendo hinterlands.
I was envisioning something like getting a $50,000 grant from Humboldt Area Foundation (HAF) or elsewhere, pay some energetic young person $30,000 a year, or more, and maybe work out of some office at Redwoods Rural (RRHC) or elsewhere.
Then blanket social media, newspapers, radio, and other media with announcements and ads about the outreach campaign.
Just dreaming on here: I could see paying the outreach worker with incentives, maybe he/she would get their quota in six months and walk off with a fat bonus, and try it again the next year.
One thing I got wrong was the monthly payment, it’s $1185, not $914. I had just met someone who was getting $1185, someone else I know was getting $800, so I split the difference with the sum I found online.
I was trying to figure out why $800 and I’m thinking maybe because it used to be they gave you a lump sum first payment, calculated from the day you applied to the day you got your first cheque. At some point they altered that policy, you still get the lump sum but they give it to you in increments so that you never have more than $2000 in your bank account. Maybe that’s what’s happening with the $800 guy…
We were talking about a 40-something woman who’s on the streets and occasionally writes into Redheaded Blackbart with her confessions of drug-addicted homelessness.
I know of a guy on the streets in Garberville
who gets SSI and he kinda deserves it as he
is definitely mentally ill, but somehow he is in charge of
his own money, and it’s a crazy street dance on the first of the month:
First his “protector,” a homeless friend who is like his “mentor” and tries to keep him away from the fentanyl-laced drugs, stakes out the ATM, trying to get his cut of the guy’s SSI money.
Then someone from his family who’s been helping him tries to get his cut,
and by the third of the month the $1185 is down to about $300,
and gone completely by the fifth…
Well, if he got to keep all the money it could be dangerous to his health, and it would be gone by the fifth anyway, if he survived…(then it’s down to free donuts for the rest of the month…)
She should get SSI just for having the ‘oves to write her essays to Blackbelt IMO…(Or as a reward if she could get off the white powder for a year?)
One more thing I found out is that if you qualify for SSI but your spouse is working, then if she makes more than $48,000 a year you wouldn’t be eligible. If she made a lot yes, then yes, some would be subtracted from your check, depending on her salary. If you were not married you would get your whole check, unless you were “deemed” married (common-law?) by “your community.” If you just live in the house non-affiliated to anyone then you get to keep the whole check…
One more reason it’s stacked against the poor SSI recipient is that someone who lives in his own house gets a full check, someone who rents has to pay rent out of their check.
Anyway, SSI, somebody cares, sure don’t have that in Mexico, not sure about European countries, but doubt they would let their citizens starve not the streets…
If you’re on SSI and you get a gift, in the form of a check, like an inheritance, then there is a way
to receive that money and it won’t count against you: recently someone i know got an inheritance, told SSI truthfully it was going to be used for repairs and improvements on her house, I think she or the business doing the work had to show SSI the receipts, and it worked out with no loss of money…
(Next time I have a short piece about the inequities in the food stamps/Calfresh system…)
(Preview of coming attractions, if this one makes the cut,
it might not as it’s full of lies, insinuations, bestiality, and possibly libel or slander.)
Here are some excerpts:
How To Write For The AVA
It’s always fun to laugh at and pile on clueless dolts in the AVA, in this case a guy needing medical attention after a dog or maybe it was a horse.
The mercurial Editor is a grandfather and generally tries to keep the paper clean, though in one of his own stories last summer he threw out a stream of “mother——-’s” when quoting his experiences with radical blacks in the turbulent sixties.
For example the latest one by Eric McMahon last week telling about his first job, a day moving rocks around in his youth. Really?
Eyster: It was burgers and beer! I’m the District Attorney! I am GOD! Do you want to keep your job? Okay, on to lawn care products, that’s another five grand, at least…
Once free, Flynn quickly went went back on the powder, was no longer inspired to write for the AVA, and the Editor had to sublimate his Dannie M. Martin dreams.
Most of the writers today are very well-behaved, like Raskin, and don’t poke the God: Yearsley can actually be digestible and interesting half the time (when he dumbs it down for the likes of me, anyway), and Holland is “revered” at the AVA, making me wonder if Bruce has ever looked very deeply into Doug’s raw and addictive blog?
(Also, quite a few of the regular contributors to this here Geezer Gazette freely admit to being one toke over the line.)
(I’m a professional writer myself, I know this because I have a copy of the twenty-five dollar cheque I received from the AVA twenty years ago)
Which brings us to this important question: If the AVA stops covering the board of supes, does that mean the board is no longer dysfunctional, like the mythical tree falling in the forest?
…being whomever we say we are and having the intellectual insight and vision to start our personal history anew each morning, to coin a phrase. (Can you really do that?)
Okay, I’m done : GO TEXANS, 49ERS, BUCKS, BILLS!!!
I’m a disabled American veteran who was on SSI then I got married and was late reporting it when I did I lost my SSI then I was told I had to pay them back so they take money out of my retirement pay and I can’t even get foodstamps snap benefits it’s really hard enough living in Hawaii to they say my wife makes to much money heck I get married and all of sudden I’m not Disabled anymore wow
Keep at them, and you might get it back.
Persistence is very necessary in things like getting a referral for a medical appointment with specialists, sometimes you have to hand-deliver the x-rays etc, you need to have a pushy mentality and keep contacting them. Too many times the papers get put aside or lost…
Did you try to get food stamps?
Food stamps are a separate issue, it seems to me, and very easy to get, though there are large inequities in the system, where those who have more assets, get more food stamps, and I’ll be writing more about that soon…
tiwanadah@gmail.com I’m very excited about My money 🤑 every month that is a Blessing for me
Yes! Good to hear…
Supervisor Challenge
The two wealthy candidates for Humboldt County’s Second Supervisorial District, the incumbent Michelle Bushnell and the challenger Jeana McClendon say a lot of nice things about themselves in their campaign mailers and advertisements, but do they really care enough about those folks who are poor and struggling that one or both will pledge to actually do something to help those in need? (There’s also the fringe wildcard candidate Brian D. Roberts)
There are a lot of people of all ages in poverty, many and I hope most are getting government help, but let’s just start with the most vulnerable segment, seniors over sixty-five who have little or no money in the bank, are eligible to receive SSI, and either aren’t aware that they qualify or need help to apply.
I propose that each of the candidates pledge to write or help to write a grant to locate and acquire funds to hire and train one or two outreach workers for this purpose. That will probably take six months to a year so I ask that each candidate consider pledging to start working on this project, using whatever networking and outreaching means are available or created, immediately after the March Fifth election. Whoever wins can join this project with the modest goal of recruiting one hundred eligible seniors in the rural Second District, all the rural areas of the county, or anyone living anywhere if they need help.
We have already started a pilot program, an informational campaign in Southern Humboldt, affixing to all the bulletin boards envelopes with handouts telling in great detail how to know if you are eligible, and how to apply for SSI.
If none of the candidates receives fifty percent plus one vote, and there is a runoff election in November, I would vote for and support either of the candidates who takes on this challenge, and acts on it to begin the process of reaching this goal of setting up a system of outreach to broke seniors.
If there is a runoff (thanks Brian D Roberts) and both candidates decide to show they actually do care enough to work on this program, the more the merrier. (Recruiting can be word of mouth, friends of friends, and other networking ideas can be generated and explored until the grants come through.)
I’d like each candidate to give a shit about those less off than ourselves, instead of just sitting there in meetings, voting and presumably helping individual constituents navigate county systems, and pulling down a fat paycheck with lots of benefits.
(This could apply to Mendocino candidates in a runoff as well, right? Put some pressure on them too.)
Thats all I want to say thank you all🙏🙏