Press "Enter" to skip to content

The Greatest Story Never Told, Continued

A San Francisco Chronicle reporter named Kevin Fagan called on Monday, July 12, to get some quotes. He explained his angle: NIDA and the prohibitionists cite studies showing that marijuana is harmful, while “the pot people” cite studies showing that it's helpful.

“And you're going to provide a fair and balanced over­view,” I said. Fagan said yes, that was his goal — and wasn't it a shame that Fox News had appropriated that slogan. Fagan said he had already talked to someone at NIDA and was due to talk to them again at length the next day. He'd heard I could tell him about the “pro-pot studies.”

So I told him about Donald Tashkin's finding that smoking marijuana does not cause lung cancer. I called it “the greatest story never told” and promised to send O'Shaughnessy's piece about Tashkin, a distinguished UCLA pulmonologist who is hardly “pro-pot.” I told him about Steven Sidney's review of 65,000 Kaiser patients' records showing that marijuana use does not cause lung cancer or increase mortality — another suppressed blockbuster. I told him about the data that Tom O'Con­nell and other California doctors had compiled about their cannabis-using patients. I told him about the Inter­national Cannabinoid Research Society…

Given that the medical marijuana movement was a local story of national importance, I opined, the Chroni­cle's coverage over the years had been meager and superficial. Fagan said they were on it now — he was one of four reporters assigned to cover Prop 19.

I emailed him my report on Tashkin's findings along with some advice about how to pursue the story:

“When you're talking to the NIDA rep tomorrow, why not ask about the decision not to feature Tashkin's findings in NIDA Notes back in 2005? Who made that decision? Which editor(s)? Did they run it by the direc­tor? (Who, BTW, is Leon Trotsky's great-granddaugh­ter.) Tashkin's findings are big news indeed on the sci­ence side. But who suppressed those findings is an equally big story (on the political side).”

Fagan's piece ran on the front page Sunday July 12 under the headline, “Healthy or Harmful? Pot debate rages on.” More than twice as many column inches were devoted to the NIDA line than to studies showing bene­ficial effect. Neither Donald Tashkin nor Steven Sidney was mentioned. I was quoted saying that (Tashkin's) photomicrographs of bronchial tissue damaged by can­nabis smoke could scare the daylights out of you — but not quoted saying that (to Tashkin's surprise) the dam­aged cells don't metastasize, they die off; or that (Tash­kin had concluded) the protective effects of cannabis more than make up for any collateral cellular damage.

The San Francisco Chronicle should not have to assign a reporter in July, 2010, to do a quick study on the state of the research on marijuana as medicine. The Chronicle should have been the paper of record all these years. And journalists should be fair, of course. But there's nothing admirable about giving equal weight to the truth and to the lies in the name of “balance.”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *