Press "Enter" to skip to content

What’s Dave’s Side Of The Story?

For a decade or more Dave Eyster had been striding along nicely, doing well, sitting pretty, operating his local Inmate Prison Assembly Line with great efficiency, if not much compassion.

But who wants a compassionate District Attorney anyway?

Enough that he maintains a brisk pace packing local criminals off to lockdown duty, and keeping his office scandal free.

Then, after many years hiking in the general direction of retirement, Dave Eyster stepped in a messy pile of manure of his own making. Yes, he’d dropped a load, then turned back and stepped in it, stepped in it again, then stomped up and down on it and finally laid down and rolled like a dog in his own stinking mess.

Not exactly unprecedented: It happens.

The sense I get around Ukiah, and maybe around the county, is that Dave Eyster stinks and we ought to get rid of him, There’s news of a recall. There’s talk of the county being on the hook for, potentially, hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, in legal fees, lawsuit settlements and the like.

What there is not, and never has been, is any sort of explanation from Dave Eyster about this mess he’s made and that has brought him to the point of loathing, disrespect and getting tossed out of office.

But I have always thought Dave, a master at the art of Opening Statements and Closing Arguments, could explain things in public. He could mount the county courthouse steps some sunny morning and offer a succinct, plausible and perhaps even sympathetic explanation for all this.

Suppose he were to draw our collective attention back to the bad old days of marijuana prosecutions in Mendocino County. The rules, regulations, laws and practices were confusing, stupid, punitive and forever changing.

Mendocino County District Attorneys going back to Joe Allen and up through Vivian Rackauckas, Susan Massini, Norm Vroman and Meredith Lintott had grappled with approaches to weed prosecution sanity, and all had failed.

Then came Dave Eyster, and he might remind us while speaking from those courthouse steps, how he had simply wiped the cobwebs and confusion aside, and offered simple solutions to those arrested on a marijuana offense: Face jail time or pay a hefty fine.

What did these defendants all do? Why, they paid fees ranging from big to gigantic. This resulted in many things, all of them good. It reduced the jail population, it reduced the headaches the judges were experiencing, it stuffed many hundreds of thousands of dollars into county coffers, and remind me—what was the downside?

Dave might have said all that, but of course in a more persuasive manner. He might have pointed out that, given the marijuana money he brought into the county coffers, it was petulant to scold him for spending nickels and dimes on annual DA Christmas fiestas at The Broiler.

And la affaire Cubbison, he could add, would not have been possible without the enthusiastic participation of county administrators eager to mesh county offices and consolidate power. Nor should we forget it was the county Board of Supervisors who terminated an elected official (by a vote of 5-0) then ran for cover when the manure hit the fan. They let Eyster take the fall.

Or words similar. Had Dave provided a thoughtful response it might have defused the rising tide of grumbles. It might have lanced the boil before it became a tumor.

Or Dave might have tried for sympathy, positioning himself as the victim of cheap journalistic shots. He could have pointed out that every news story in all the local media came from one disgruntled former DA office employee. Dave might add that the vendetta began even earlier, during the prosecution of a Ukiah police officer accused of crimes, with coverage by the same former journalist.

Yes Dave Eyster could have made strenuous arguments on his own behalf but that would have forced him to look weak, like a criminal defendant seeking a plea bargain while not admitting guilt. That’s just never been Dave Eyster’s style or mindset.

And perhaps ultimately he knows he orchestrated the mess of his own making and rather than blame someone else or try to mitigate his responsibility he’ll stand tall and face the consequences.

For more than a year he’s remained aloof in his corner office, perhaps thinking he’s above criticism and need not stoop to respond.

But silence seems suspicious, and citizens certainly have plenty of reasons for suspicion.


Mike Geniella:

As is often the case these days, Tom Hine gets it wrong.

  • I was never an “employee” of the District Attorney’s Office. I worked part-time under contract as a media consultant. I received no county benefits.
  • I quit. I called the DA on an incident involving local media, and then submitted a 30-day notice to terminate our contract. It was my choice, and my action. I have not spoken to Eyster since.
  • Eyster approved a negotiated plea settlement to drop serious sex charges against a former Ukiah Police Sergeant, and a possession of methamphetamine charge stemming from what Officer Kevin Murphy had kept in his police locker. The DA’s then-chief investigator made the discovery during a search at the Ukiah Police Department. Nevertheless, Eyster, in return for a no contest plea to felony dissuading or intimidating a witness and a misdemeanor charge of false imprisonment, allowed Murphy to avoid a prison sentence.
  • I never accused anyone of a conspiracy. The DA supported the Murray plea deal that was presented to Judge Ann Moorman by the attorneys involved.
  • Hine, in his assessment from afar, overlooks a three-page document entered into the criminal trial of Cubbison. It shows Eyster communicated to retired County Supervisor Glenn McGourty a secret three-step plan to oust the embattled County Auditor and form a new County Department of Finance more favorable to board oversight instead of an elected, independent Auditor. Eyster publicly denounced Cubbison, blocked her interim appointment, and then ordered an internal follow up by his squad of investigators to lukewarm sheriff investigation conclusions into her alleged felony misconduct. It took the DA nearly a year to formally charge Cubbison.

14 Comments

  1. John Sakowicz August 29, 2025

    I stand with Dave.

    Quoting from a press release from the Mendocino County District Attorney’s Office, dated August 27:

    “UKIAH: DA EYSTER RATED AS AN ‘AV PREEMINENT’ ATTORNEY … AGAIN.

    “Mendocino County District Attorney David Eyster has been recognized for yet another year (2025) as an “AV Preeminent” attorney, a professional rating that only a limited few attorneys are able to achieve in their professional careers.

    “Since 1887, Martindale-Hubbell has been maintaining this peer-review rating system for lawyers, a rating system where practicing attorneys in all 50 states are reviewed by other attorneys and judges.

    “This distinguished honor (“AV Preeminent”) represents the highest possible Martindale rating for legal ability and ethical standards. It is one of the most respected distinctions in the legal field.

    “Attorneys who receive this particular recognition are evaluated by their peers — fellow lawyers and members of the judiciary — on two critical factors:
    1. Legal Ability (A): Includes proficiency in legal knowledge, analytical capabilities, judgment, communication skills, and legal experience.
    2. Ethics (V): Reflects the attorney’s professional standards, adherence to rules of conduct, and commitment to fairness.

    “In a separate rating system (AVVO), DA Eyster continues to also receive a “Superb” professional rating, receiving the top rating of 10 out of a possible 10.”

  2. Chuck Dunbar August 29, 2025

    Wrong side, John.
    Eyster fails: Hubris, ego, bad judgment, bureaucratic infighting using the power of his office against County staff diligently performing her job.
    He fails on Ethics on this one, big-time. Maybe the other attorneys judge him highly, maybe the info is dated, maybe his peers do not get it. But it’s the public who get the final say, the people–those he and his staff represent in Court. He failed badly on this one, his recent memo on this issue was dishonest and sorely lacking. I hope the recall succeeds.

    • George Dorner August 29, 2025

      Hmmm? So it’s fair for a DA to cancel the public’s vote and unelect a public official? As a means of avoiding accountability for the DA’s party slush fund?

  3. TWK (aka Tom Hine) August 29, 2025

    Geniella, the most thin-skinned and easily offended of any of many Mendo County journalists, is forever demanding retractions and apologies to soothe his wounded pride and what he thinks of as his sterling reputation.
    Dear Reader: Please review my above article and ask yourself what in the hell is Geniella (once again) crying about. Where does it say he was fired? Where does it say there was a conspiracy? Where does the name “Geniella” even appear? His inflated opinion of himself has been stretched to the bursting point. What a self-absorbed, comically serious buffoon.

    • mike Geniella August 31, 2025

      Tom Hine, your edited version printed here is not the same as published in the Ukiah Daily Journal on Aug. 24.

      In that version, you wrote, “He (Eyster) could have pointed out that every news story in all the local media came from one disgruntled former DA office employee that Dave HAD PERSONALLY FIRED. ”
      That version also declares, “Dave might add that the vendetta began even earlier, during the prosecution of a Ukiah police officer accused of crimes. The ex-DA public relations man wrote numerous accounts of the soiled cop story, all suggesting his sentencing was a conspiracy involving Eyster and Superior Court Judge Ann Moorman.”
      Why, Hine, do you keep manipulating the facts?
      After 50 years in the news business, I am hardly ‘thin-skinned.’ My work has withstood challenges from some tough characters over time.
      For many years, I considered you a professional colleague and friend. Sadly, Tom Hine, your inflated opinion of yourself is pathetic, and your derogatory comments about me and my professionalism are reasons enough to walk away from a toxic relationship.
      For readers, I am including a copy of my Letter to the Editor of the Ukiah Daily Journal.

      Editor,

      Tom Hine’s attacks on my professional integrity in his column published today (Aug. 24) are outrageous.

      His contentions are false, and a retraction is necessary.

      Hine, in his column, declared, and I quote:

      “He could have pointed out that every news story in all the local media came from one disgruntled former DA office employee that Dave had personally fired. Dave might add that the vendetta began even earlier, during the prosecution of a Ukiah police officer accused of crimes.

      The ex-DA public relations man wrote numerous accounts of the soiled cop story, all suggesting his sentencing was a conspiracy involving Eyster and Superior Court Judge Ann Moorman.”

      The truth, which eludes Hine in his quest to defame my 50 years as a responsible journalist, is starkly different.

      DA Eyster did not ‘personally fire’ me.

      In fact, I was the one who terminated a contract with Eyster as a part-time media consultant. I was never an ’employee’ of the District Attorney’s Office, nor did I collect any benefits from the County of Mendocino beyond the agreed-upon consulting fees. A copy of the contract agreed upon by DA Eyster and me is a public record and available for review. So is my letter ending the arrangement.

      I never wrote about a ‘conspiracy’ surrounding the questionable plea bargain DA Eyster approved for disgraced Ukiah Police Officer Kevin Murray that was presented to Judge Ann Moorman by the prosecution and defense attorneys. The conspiracy is in the mind of Hine, as he continues his slide into distortions, lies, and manipulation of facts.

      I accurately reported that DA Eyster agreed to drop serious sex charges against the disgraced Murray in return for no contest pleas to misdemeanor charges that allowed him to avoid recommended prison terms. Eyster also dropped a drug-related charge after his own chief investigator, during an earlier search, discovered a packet of methamphetamine in Murray’s police locker. The Sonoma County Probation Office, which reviewed and recommended a prison term for Murray, later complained that Eyster’s office failed to provide supporting evidence of the police sergeant’s actions in other cases, including the beating of a Ukiah man. The city of Ukiah has paid a total of $3 million to settle subsequent civil cases surrounding Murray’s actions as a local police officer.

      Tom Hine’s reckless disregard for the truth is appalling. His scurrilous accusations about my professional integrity are unacceptable, false, and in need of retraction. Unlike Tom Hine, I reviewed records and attended criminal proceedings related to the Murray and Cubbison cases. I heard facts presented during the sworn testimony of witnesses in courtrooms. I never saw Hine at any of the proceedings.

      Mike Geniella

      Journalist

  4. Joe Lee August 31, 2025

    I stand with TWK…and a big ol smile!

  5. Bruce McEwen August 31, 2025

    Nice to hear both sides to the story, finally. But what happened between Mike Giniella and Paul Sequiera? I heard Sequiera said something touchy about who paid for Giniella’s black Jaguar and he demanded Eyster fire Sequiera? How far off is that from the facts.

    • Mike Geniella August 31, 2025

      For the record, my good friend Paul Sequeira’s firing had nothing to do with me. Eyster, in a petty fit, lost his cool in an after-work telephone call, flew off the handle, and ordered Sequeira to come in the next day and clear out his office. It shocked the staff and the entire courthouse. All respected Paul for his keen legal skills, professional standards, and warm personality. My Jaguar X-type, which I happily drove for eight years, was bought from SF attorney Bill Fazio, my oldest son’s father-in-law. The gray beauty belonged to Fazio’s late wife, Peti. I loved her and that car. Let’s seek what Hine can make of this account from a “comically serious buffoon.”

      • Bruce McEwen August 31, 2025

        Thank you. What about Josh Rosenfeld suddenly quitting to go to the police academy and join Ukiah PD? Josh wouldn’t tell me how that happened but he was another great prosecutor— he’s now in Ft. Bragg, to the best of my feeble knowledge….Do you know about that?

        • Mike Geniella August 31, 2025

          I believe Josh Rosenfeld is now with the Mendocino County Counsel’s Office after a stint in the Humboldt County District Attorney’s Office. Josh is a good man. I will let him tell his own story.

          • Bruce McEwen August 31, 2025

            I think he’s the best man to take Dave’s job; he’s got the out-on-the-streets experience and Dave could step down and appoint him the way Tom appointed Matt at the Sheriff’s Office. Thanks again, Mike. Tom looks more and more like he’s the disgruntled crackpot… not you.

            Hey Tommy—Whadda ya got to say for yourself now?

  6. Tom Hine (aka TWK) August 31, 2025

    Oh gee whiz Bruce, I don’t know. Whatever my response the big crybaby will hurry off with a demand for more apologies and more acknowledgments of his great big skills as a major league journalist, a term he insists on applying to himself for fear the rest of us might forget. Know anyone else so prone to hysteria at the slightest insult, real or imagined?

    Take this week’s column. Read it again, three times if necessary. It makes no mention of anyone firing anyone, Geniella’s name isn’t even in it, but he wants to blubber and shake his fist because of another column in a different publication a week or two ago. Can you beat it??

    Responding to Geniella’s wild but predictable outbursts means you have to engage with his anger. As Mark Twain said “Never argue with a stupid person. First they’ll drag you down to their level and then beat you with their experience.”

    • Mike Geniella August 31, 2025

      It is interesting to note that Hine now claims two columns. In the first article published in the Journal, he stated that Eyster had fired me, thereby creating the so-called ‘vendetta’ he claimed I have been waging. Then, in the version printed today in the AVA, that claim was deleted after his falsehoods were noted. Then, as Hine does these days, he defames his critics in a manner that rivals his current political idol.
      Wild, but predictable outbursts? No, Hine. Calling you on your shit. Show some responsibility and acknowledge that you fucked up.

      • Paul Modic September 1, 2025

        No TWK didn’t fuck up, he was just being himself, if you go to any paragraph he ever wrote in any of his columns there will be an assertion which is a lie but is called hyperbole, exaggeration and satire. He lies about everything, tries to be funny, that’s his schtick, whereas your thing is to just give the facts jack.
        Most of his targets are usually general whereas he made it personal with you so you have to respond to his inaccuracies. He either knew or didn’t that his assertion wasn’t true and it doesn’t matter to him, he likes to bait you.
        He reminds me of a frenemy I have who trolls me, then when I object and respond seriously says she was just joking, etc, implying I don’t have a sense of humor or something. It’s annoying.
        Anyway, he’s doing what he does, stirring up the shit with crass exaggerations and you’re doing your thing, fact-checking. (His so-called argument that he never named you in his article is weak, anyone paying attention knows who he meant.)

Leave a Reply to George Dorner Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

-